|
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION |
|
STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR PROFILE |
|
FALL SEMESTER 2007 |
|
|
|
Instructor: Schuessler, Joseph H |
Course: BCIS3610005 |
Final Enrollment: 109 |
|
Department: ITDS |
Evaluation Code No: 3191 |
Number of Responses: 66 |
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
-----SECTION----- |
-----COMPARISON----- |
|
|
|
|
|
-Frequencies**- |
--Averages-- |
COBA Percentiles |
|
|
COBA Qnt. * |
Mean |
Std. Dev |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA |
CRS |
DEPT |
COBA |
00 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
|
Presentation Ability - (8 items) |
2 |
3.6 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
2.7 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
|
19. Cares about the quality of his/her teaching |
3 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
1 |
4 |
12 |
32 |
13 |
4 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
2.3 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
20. Has a genuine interest in students |
3 |
3.8 |
1.0 |
1 |
6 |
13 |
27 |
15 |
4 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
2.2 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
|
22. Is a dynamic and energetic person |
2 |
3.3 |
1.0 |
3 |
8 |
23 |
24 |
5 |
3 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
2.5 |
3.2 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
|
23. Interesting style of presentation |
2 |
3.1 |
1.1 |
5 |
14 |
20 |
18 |
6 |
3 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
|
24. Seems to enjoy teaching |
2 |
3.5 |
1.0 |
2 |
6 |
24 |
18 |
13 |
3 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
2.2 |
3.4 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
25. Is enthusiastic about his/her subject |
2 |
3.7 |
1.0 |
1 |
10 |
8 |
33 |
11 |
3 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
3.1 |
3.7 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.5 |
|
26. Seems to have self confidence |
1 |
3.8 |
0.8 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
33 |
11 |
3 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
3.2 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
4.7 |
|
27. Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice |
2 |
3.4 |
1.0 |
2 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
3.2 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization/Clarity - (8 items) |
3 |
4.0 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
2.7 |
3.4 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
|
5. Is well prepared |
2 |
4.2 |
0.8 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
25 |
26 |
2 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
2.6 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
4.6 |
|
6. Speaks in a manner easy to understand |
2 |
3.9 |
1.0 |
1 |
3 |
17 |
22 |
21 |
2 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
|
11. Explains clearly |
3 |
3.9 |
0.9 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
25 |
18 |
4 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
2.6 |
3.2 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
|
12. Lectures easy to outline/Case discuss. organiz. |
3 |
4.0 |
0.9 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
22 |
24 |
3 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
2.7 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
|
13. Careful/precise in answering questions |
3 |
4.1 |
0.7 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
32 |
18 |
3 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
|
14. Summarizes major points |
4 |
4.2 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
28 |
24 |
4 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
3.1 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
15. States objectives for each class section |
5 |
4.4 |
0.8 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
17 |
38 |
3 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
18. Knows if class understands him/her or not |
2 |
3.4 |
1.0 |
2 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
9 |
5 |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grading/Assignments - (7 items) |
3 |
4.1 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
2.7 |
3.4 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
1. Follows course plan established in syllabus |
3 |
4.3 |
0.8 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
29 |
26 |
3 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.6 |
|
2. Gives assignments related to course goals |
2 |
4.0 |
0.9 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
28 |
22 |
2 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
3.2 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
4.5 |
|
3. Explains the grading system clearly |
3 |
4.1 |
0.9 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
28 |
24 |
2 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
2.8 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
|
4. Is accessible to students out of class |
3 |
4.0 |
0.8 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
24 |
18 |
6 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
3.5 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
|
31. Given nature exams/papers-return quickly |
3 |
4.0 |
0.9 |
0 |
4 |
11 |
26 |
22 |
3 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.5 |
|
32. Reasonable assign./exams - length/diff. |
3 |
3.7 |
1.1 |
3 |
5 |
14 |
24 |
17 |
3 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
2.8 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
|
33. Assigns grades fairly and impartially |
3 |
4.2 |
0.8 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
29 |
23 |
4 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
3.1 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual/Scholarly - (4 items) |
2 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.0 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
|
7. Discusses points of view other than his/hers |
3 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
22 |
16 |
5 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
|
8. Contrasts implications of various theories |
2 |
3.8 |
0.8 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
20 |
12 |
10 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
4.4 |
|
9. Discusses recent developments in the field |
2 |
3.9 |
1.0 |
0 |
8 |
10 |
29 |
17 |
2 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
2.6 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
|
10. Presents origins of ideas and concepts |
2 |
3.7 |
0.9 |
0 |
5 |
21 |
23 |
13 |
4 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.0 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Interaction - (3 items) |
3 |
3.6 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
2.2 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
4.3 |
|
16. Encourages class discussion |
3 |
3.3 |
1.1 |
3 |
9 |
22 |
18 |
9 |
5 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
3.8 |
4.3 |
|
17. Invites criticism of own ideas |
3 |
3.5 |
1.0 |
2 |
6 |
20 |
20 |
9 |
9 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
2.3 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
|
21. Respects/takes student concerns seriously |
3 |
4.0 |
0.8 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
28 |
19 |
3 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Motivation - (3 items) |
2 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
2.6 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
|
28. Makes me work harder than most other courses |
2 |
3.3 |
0.8 |
2 |
7 |
30 |
21 |
3 |
3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
2.8 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
|
29. Motivates me to do my best work |
2 |
3.3 |
1.0 |
2 |
12 |
22 |
19 |
8 |
3 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
2.4 |
3.0 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
|
30. Exams require creative/original thinking |
2 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
2 |
11 |
26 |
22 |
2 |
3 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
2.4 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Grade Summary |
Qnt.* |
GPA |
SD |
A |
B |
C/P |
D |
F/WF |
W |
I/PR |
Tot |
12Day |
CRS |
DEPT |
COBA |
00 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
|
|
4 |
2.55 |
0.95 |
13 |
47 |
37 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
106 |
109 |
2.72 |
2.19 |
2.27 |
1.38 |
1.76 |
2.09 |
2.52 |
2.66 |
|
Percentage of class grades |
12 |
44 |
35 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*"COBA Qnt." is the section quintile computed from all 31 undergraduate
CORE classes with more than 89 students. |
|
|
|
** 1 = NOT AT ALL DESCRIPTIVE, 5 = VERY DESCRIPTIVE so Quintile 5 is the
top 20% and Quintile 1 is the bottom 20% of the distribution. |
|
|
|
Please note that the "DEPT" and "COBA" columns include all undergraduate
CORE classes with more than 89 students in the academic unit and college
respectively. |
|
|
|
A. THE COURSE-STRONG POINTS: |
|
1. |
Well laid out. |
|
2. |
Fair instructor |
|
3. |
Deals with things we may not have thought we would have to in the
business world. |
|
|
|
B. THE COURSE-WEAK POINTS: |
|
1. |
Monotone. Boring. |
|
2. |
Tedious, hard to find motivation. |
|
3. |
Speaks too quickly. Tests aren't his own. Assignments don't reflect quiz
question. |
|
4. |
Very dry course. |
|
5. |
Not interesting. |
|
6. |
Class is redundant and boring. |
|
7. |
Boring material. |
|
|
|
C. THE COURSE-SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS: |
|
1. |
Add more excitement. Video. etc. |
|
2. |
Make attendence more necessary. |
|
3. |
It's good |
|
|
|
D. THE INSTRUCTOR-STRONG POINTS: |
|
1. |
Passionate about the class & is well prepared. Asks the class on
ways he can improve & has improved in those areas & taken our
suggestions seriously. |
|
2. |
Knowledge of the material & industry. Relates to students,
approachable. |
|
3. |
Knows the material. |
|
4. |
Understanding and smart. |
|
5. |
Very clear & takes a lot of care in his lectures. Very approachable when
having trouble or difficulty. |
|
6. |
Nice lectures. |
|
7. |
By far, the best computer teacher ever had! |
|
|
|
E. THE INSTRUCTOR-WEAK POINTS: |
|
1. |
Nothing. |
|
2. |
Some lectures are slow (It would be helpful to find more creative ways
to lecture over Project and Access to make them more exciting). |
|
3. |
Don't like the Project/Access work. |
|
|
|
F. THE INSTRUCTOR-SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS: |
|
1. |
Good teacher. |
|
|